Journal
EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 355-361Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13163
Keywords
concussion; mild traumatic brain injury; neurocognitive testing
Categories
Funding
- European Commission [FP7-270259-TBICare]
- Neurosciences Theme of the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
- UK Department of Health
- Neurodegeneration Theme of the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
- Mental Health Theme of the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
- NIHR Brain Injury MedTech Co-operative
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR, UK) through the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Centre grant
- Health Foundation/Academy of Medical Sciences Clinician Scientist Fellowship
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR, UK) through Senior Investigator Award
Ask authors/readers for more resources
ObjectiveDespite mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounting for 80% of head injury diagnoses, recognition of individuals at risk of cognitive dysfunction remains a challenge in the acute setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and potential role for computerised cognitive testing as part of a complete ED head injury assessment. MethodsmTBI patients (n =36) who incurred a head injury within 24h of presentation to the ED were compared to trauma controls (n = 20) and healthy controls (n =20) on tests assessing reaction time, speed and attention, episodic memory, working memory and executive functioning. Testing occurred during their visit to the ED at a mean of 12h post-injury for mTBI and 9.4h for trauma controls. These tasks were part of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery iPad application. Healthy controls were tested in both a quiet environment and the ED to investigate the potential effects of noise and distraction on neurocognitive function. ResultsReaction time was significantly slower in the mTBI group compared to trauma patients (P =0.015) and healthy controls (P =0.011), and deficits were also seen in working memory compared to healthy controls (P <= 0.001) and in executive functioning (P =0.021 and P <0.001) compared to trauma and healthy controls. Performances in the control group did not differ between testing environments. ConclusionComputerised neurocognitive testing in the ED is feasible and can be utilised to detect deficits in cognitive performance in the mTBI population as part of a routine head injury assessment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available