4.5 Article

Evaluation of the oligosaccharide composition of commercial follicle stimulating hormone preparations

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 34, Issue 16, Pages 2394-2406

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201300045

Keywords

Glycosylation; Gonadotropin; Human follicle stimulating hormone; Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; N-glycan structure

Funding

  1. IBSA, Lugano, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycosylation is an important PTM in proteins, and it is of paramount importance for the manufacture and efficacy of therapeutic glycoproteins. The elucidation of the glycosylation patterns is greatly hampered by the structural heterogeneity, which involves the oligosaccharide moieties, and sometimes also the protein chain. Several strategies are used to map the glycosylation state of glycoproteins: they generally involve analysis of the glycopeptides obtained upon glycoprotein proteolytic digestion, and/or analysis of the glycans, enzymatic or chemically released from the glycoproteins. These approaches are efficient in determining the total glycan content, as well as the glycan structures; nevertheless, information regarding the whole protein is lost. Recent advances in MS allowed us to directly analyze human follicle stimulating hormone (hFSH). RP-HPLC/IT-TOF MS, coupled to bioinformatic algorithms, was used to determine the glycan content of intact hFSH preparations, either urinary-derived or recombinant. More traditional and complementary analytical methods (oligosaccharide profiling, IEF, and peptide mapping analyses) were employed to compare the obtained results. Our analysis shows a predominance of highly sialylated, highly branched glycans in a urinary hFSH preparation as compared to recombinant hFSH expressed in rodent cell lines. Noteworthy, high-resolution mass spectra may allow to evaluate the glycosylation profile during the manufacturing process of different preparations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available