4.6 Article

Impacts of sputter-deposited platinum thickness on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 488-493

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.023

Keywords

Dye-sensitized solar cell; DSSC; Platinum; Counter electrode; Sputter

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 100-2221-E-260-012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thickness of platinum thin film and surface roughness of the platinized counter electrode can be determined by sputtering time. A larger surface roughness is beneficial to the charge transfer efficiency and electrocatalytic activity of platinized counter electrode. When the sputtering time of 40 s is used, the dye-sensitized solar cell exhibits the largest short-circuit photocurrent density and the highest energy conversion efficiency of 6.81%. When the sputtering duration is over 80 s, both short-circuit photocurrent density and energy conversion efficiency are largely reduced. A thicker platinum film is not favorable for improving the performance of dye-sensitized solar cell. The optimum platinum thickness for sputter-deposited counter electrode approximates to 30 angstrom. The increase of peak height and peak area in cyclic voltammetric plot demonstrates larger active surface area and enhanced electrocatalytic activity of the platinized counter electrode. The dependence of short-circuit photocurrent density on platinum thickness has been further explored by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Corresponding charge transfer resistances at various platinum/electrolyte interfaces are obtained by simulation on the impedance spectra. This study has evidenced that the thickness of platinum greatly influences the electrocatalytic ability of platinized counter electrode and is certainly a significant factor for the performance of dye-sensitized solar cell. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available