4.6 Article

Formation and thermoelectric property of TiO2 nanotubes covered by Te-Bi-Pb nanoparticles

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 56, Issue 16, Pages 5794-5803

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.063

Keywords

Titanium oxide; Thermoelectricity; Nanotubes; Nanoparticles; Seebeck coefficient

Funding

  1. Doctoral Instrumentation Graduate Fellowship
  2. Summer Faculty Research Fellowship
  3. University of Toledo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A variety of strategies have been attempted to improve the performance of thermoelectric materials. The primary approach is to employ low-dimensional materials to reduce the lattice thermal conductivity as described by the Wiedemann-Franz law. That is, to decrease the thermal conductivity, rattling structures, point defects, vacancies and nanocomposites have been used to efficiently scatter phonons within or between the unit cell crystals. Complex crystalline structures have been used to decouple the electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity to achieve this goal. Based on such considerations, we have prepared TiO2 nanotubes from titanium foils. These nanotubes are low-dimensional, thus, preferable to achieve low lattice thermal conductivity to generate favorable thermoelectric properties. Moreover, scattered Te-Bi-Pb nanoparticles have been deposited on the surface of the TiO2 nanotubes via electrochemical method. The purpose of the nanoparticles is to further enhance the performance of the thermoelectricity, specifically in our case, to increase the Seebeck coefficient. From the results obtained, the best Seebeck coefficient for pure TiO2 nanotubes is about 90 mu V/K; while the best Seebeck coefficient for TiO2 nanotubes covered with scattered Te-Bi-Pb nanoparticles is about 155 mu V/K. This significant improvement could be explained by the quantum confinement in such a peculiar nanostructure. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available