4.6 Article

Mass transport studies at rotating cylinder electrode: Influence of the inter-electrode gap

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 3275-3278

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.060

Keywords

Rotating cylinder electrode; Mass transport characterization; Dimensionless correlation; Copper deposition; Triiodide reduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study shows the effect of using two different inter-electrode gaps on the RCE mass transport characterization. The average mass transport coefficient was calculated using the limiting current technique, using the soluble reduction of triiodide (smooth RCE interface) and the copper deposition (roughness RCE interface) in KNO3 and H2SO4, respectively. Based on the analysis of the Sh = aRe(b)Sc(0.356) correlation, the values of the constant a, associated with shape and cell dimensions, were 0.89 and 3.8, in the soluble system (I-3(-)/I-), for the gaps of 2.4 and 3.2 cm, respectively, indicating that this coefficient increases with inter-electrode space. While for copper deposition, these values were 0.00081 and 0.014, for the gaps of 2.4 and 3.2 cm. The constant b, associated with hydrodynamic regime, exhibits values of 0.43 and 0.33 for the gaps of 2.4 and 3.2 cm, respectively, in the system I-3(-)/I-, indicating that hydrodynamics on the smooth RCE diminishes according to the inter-electrode space. While for the system (Cu(II)/Cu), the values of b were 0.91 and 0.88, for the gaps of 2.4 and 3.2 cm. These values were higher for the copper deposition than for the soluble system, due to microturbulence at the roughened (and often powdery deposits) RCE interface. From the analysis performed in this paper is clear that inter-electrode gap and hydrodynamics on the smooth and roughness RCE interface (given by the nature of reduction reaction) modify the mass transport correlation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available