4.6 Article

Characteristics of and therapeutic options for contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

Journal

EJSO
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 418-421

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.024

Keywords

Breast cancer; Contralateral axilla; Lymph nodes; Management; Axillary dissection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) from breast cancer is uncommon. This papers aims to identify the features of our patients with CAM, as well as clarify management options. Methods: We reviewed all of our breast cancer patients during the period from 2004 to 2009. All patients with a proven pathological diagnosis of CAM were included. Patients were evaluated for demographics, tumor features and management modalities. Results: A total of 21 patients were included, forming 1.9% of our breast cancer population. The median age was 51 years (range 29-71). Twelve patients had large central or diffuse tumors. Most of the tumors were of invasive ductal type (95%), of high grade (81%) and with lymphovascular invasion (81%). The majority of cases were locally advanced (stage III: 90%). Hormonal receptor positivity and HER-2 overexpression were seen in 48% and 42% of cases, respectively. Those pathological features were significantly worse than those of patients without CAM. Ten patients had synchronous and 11 patients had metachronous CAM. Treatment modalities included axillary dissection, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Four patients died from metastatic disease and 5 patients are still alive without evidence of metastasis. Conclusion: CAM is associated with tumors with aggressive pathological features. Hormonal therapy is associated with an excellent response in patients whose tumors are hormone-receptor positive. Axillary dissection is indicated in patients with early-stage tumors, when there is no response to systemic therapy, or for palliation. It is associated with excellent local control. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available