4.6 Article

A comparison of right and extended right hepatectomy with all other hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases: A ten-year study

Journal

EJSO
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 65-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.002

Keywords

Right hepatectomy; Colorectal metasstasis; Liver resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Colorectal liver metastases are treated by a combination of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection. In this study we compared all major right-sided resections with left or parenchymal sparing resections. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 283) who had successful hepatic resections for colorectal metastases from September 1996 to November 2006 were prospectively studied. Early and late outcomes of those who had right and extended right hepatectomies (RH) were compared with those who had all other types of liver resection (AOLR). Adjuvant therapy and pre-operative assessment were standardised for all. Results: The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in the RH group were 84.1%, 54.3% and 38.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall Survival rates in the AOLR group were 95.4%, 65.9% and 53.3%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates in the RH group were 69.5%, 34.4% and 25.5%, respectively and 68.4%, 34.91% and 34.91%, respectively in the AOLR group (p = 0.46). Operative mortality was 3.9% in the RH group and 0.7% in the AOLR group (p = 0.04). Morbidity was 31.3% in the RH group and 18% in the AOLR group. Conclusion: Patients undergoing right and extended right hepatectomies for colorectal metastases have a greater operative morbidity and mortality and have a significantly worse overall survival compared to all other liver resections for the same disease. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available