4.7 Article

Cadmium supplement triggers endoplasmic reticulum stress response and cytotoxicity in primary chicken hepatocytes

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 109-114

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.033

Keywords

Cadmium; Chicken hepatocytes; Endoplasmic reticulum Stress; Expression of GRP78; Calcium homeostasis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901088]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Heilongjiang Provincial University [1252-NCET-009]
  3. Science Foundation of the Education Department of Heilongjiang Province [12511031]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20110491021, 2012T50301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cadmium (Cd), a potent hepatotoxin, has been reported to induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in various cell types. However, whether such effect exists in bird is still unclear. To delineate the effects of Cd exposure on ER stress response, we examined the expression of 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) and alteration in calcium homeostasis in primary chicken hepatocytes treated with 2-22 mu M Cd for 24 h. A significant decrease of cell viability was observed in chicken hepatocytes following Cd administration. In cells treated with Cd, GRP78 protein levels increased in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, GRP78 and GRP94 mRNA levels were elevated in response to Cd exposure. The increase of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in chicken hepatocytes was found during Cd exposure. Cd significantly decreased the CaM mRNA levels in hepatocytes. These results show that Cd regulates the expression of GRP78 and calcium homeostasis in chicken hepatocytes, suggesting that ER stress induced by Cd plays an important role in the mechanisms of Cd cytotoxicity to the bird hepatocytes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available