4.7 Article

Influence of magnesium on copper phytotoxicity to and accumulation and translocation in grapevines

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 36-42

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.02.008

Keywords

Copper; Free ion activity; Grapevine; Magnesium; Phytotoxicity

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC 98-2313-B-451-004-MY3, NSC 102-2313-B-451-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phytotoxic effects of excess copper (Cu) on grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. var. Kyoho) were examined, both from macroscopic and microscopic perspectives, by using a fifteen-day hydroponic experiments. The influence of magnesium (Mg) on Cu phytotoxicity to, and accumulation and translocation in grapevines was also observed. For phytotoxicity effect, results showed that a relative low median growth inhibition level of Cu was found for grapevine roots (0.809-3.671 mu M). Moreover, Cu toxicity was significantly alleviated by Mg treatment at Mg2+ activity between 0.15 and 2.01 mM. For accumulation and translocation effects, results indicated that competition for binding sites between Cu and Mg occurred for roots; however, Mg and Cu levels in stems and leaves were not affected by solution metals concentration. At Cu concentration less than 1 mu M, the translocation of Cu was decreased significantly for the highest Mg treatment; at Cu concentrations greater than 5 mu M, no obvious change was observed in leaf TF value between Mg treatments, while an increasing trend of stem TF value was observed with increasing Mg. These results suggest that the toxic effect resulted from metals depend not only on the competition of coexistent cations for plasma membrane surface, but also on the transport and distribution of toxic metals in physiological active sites in plants. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available