4.6 Article

The Superior Performance of Sol-Gel Made Ce-O-P Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 221-229

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07734

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Technology Support Program [2014BAC22B06]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577122]
  3. Key Project of Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Program [2012C03003-4]
  4. Program for Zhejiang Leading Team of ST Innovation [2013TD07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a solgel made Ce-O-P catalyst (referred to as Ce-O-P-SG) was employed for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3, which was directly compared with two other Ce-O-P samples as synthesized via hydrothermal and coprecipitation routes (referred to as Ce-O-P-HT and Ce-O-P-CP, respectively). Experimental results revealed that the Ce-O-P-SG catalyst yielded a more than 90% NO conversion at 200 degrees C in the presence of 10 vol % H2O, whereas Ce-O-P-HT and Ce-O-P-CP catalysts only showed 50% and 20% NO conversions under the same conditions, respectively. After subjected to a series of characterization technologies (e.g., XRD, BET-BJH, XPS, NH3-TPD, py-IR, and H-2-TPR), it was found that more enriched surface Ce(4+) species were formed except for the two main CePO4 phases (monazite and rhabdophane phases) of the Ce-O-P-SG catalyst compared to the other two samples, resulting in the increase of surficial active oxygen ions content. This could lead to an enhancement in surface acidity and redox capacity of the Ce-O-P-SG catalyst, effectively promoting the NH3-SCR activity of the catalyst. Further analyses on SO2 and H2O tolerance revealed that the Ce-O-P-SG possessed a higher sulfur resistance than the other two samples, which could be attributed to the SO2 trapping effect by the abundant active oxygen species over Ce-O-P-SG catalyst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available