4.5 Article

Acid Sensitivity of Lakes in Nova Scotia, Canada: Assessment of Lakes at Risk

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 1249-1263

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-011-9479-x

Keywords

acid neutralising capacity; calcium; pH; dissolved organic carbon; catchment attributes; empirical models; multiple linear regression

Categories

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sensitivity of surface waters to acidic deposition is governed by the interaction of catchment geology, soils, topography, land use, climate and atmospheric deposition. Accordingly at the landscape scale, catchment attributes may be used to predict lake chemistry (for example, acid neutralising capacity (ANC), pH, calcium (Ca2+) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC)). Empirical (multiple linear regression) models based on average measured chemistry (2000-2006) for 204 lakes in Nova Scotia (NS) Canada, and their catchment attributes, were used to predict chemistry for all lakes in NS (n = 6104). Damage to aquatic biota, such as loss of species and/or reduced biodiversity has been widely evaluated using critical chemical thresholds commonly based on pH, ANC and Ca2+. The proportion of sensitive lakes in NS (that is, the stock at risk) was estimated as lakes with ANC less than 20 mu eq l(-1), pH below 6, and Ca2+ less than 75 leq l(-1) (13, 73 and 74%, respectively). Many lakes in NS are characterized by high DOC (> 7 mg l(-1)); in these lakes organic acids contribute to total acidity, making anthropogenic influences difficult to discern. To account for the potential contribution of organic acidity, all lakes with pH below 6 (and DOC < 7 mg l(-1)) and lakes below a threshold for ANC adjusted for organic acids were quantified; 63% of the lakes fell below either of these thresholds. Despite substantial reductions in sulphur emissions in North America since the 1980s, many lakes in NS remain at risk to acidic deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available