Increased competition does not lead to increased phylogenetic overdispersion in a native grassland
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Increased competition does not lead to increased phylogenetic overdispersion in a native grassland
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1168-1176
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-07-11
DOI
10.1111/ele.12153
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Alpine cushion plants inhibit the loss of phylogenetic diversity in severe environments
- (2013) B. J. Butterfield et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Trait divergence and indirect interactions allow facilitation of congeneric species
- (2012) Elisa Beltrán et al. ANNALS OF BOTANY
- Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives
- (2012) Nicolas Mouquet et al. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
- Effects of competition on phylogenetic signal and phenotypic plasticity in plant functional traits
- (2012) Jean H. Burns et al. ECOLOGY
- Competition on productivity gradients - what do we expect?
- (2012) Mark Rees ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Environmental conditions and biotic interactions acting together promote phylogenetic randomness in semi-arid plant communities: new methods help to avoid misleading conclusions
- (2012) Santiago Soliveres et al. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
- Evaluating the Relationship between Competition and Productivity within a Native Grassland
- (2012) Jonathan A. Bennett et al. PLoS One
- Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion
- (2011) Cyrille Violle et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Interactions among plants and evolution
- (2011) Andrea S. Thorpe et al. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
- Evidence for assembly rules: limiting similarity within a saltmarsh
- (2011) J. Bastow Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
- Independent Evolution of Leaf and Root Traits within and among Temperate Grassland Plant Communities
- (2011) Steven W. Kembel et al. PLoS One
- More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test
- (2011) J. H. Burns et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology
- (2010) S. W. Kembel et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest
- (2010) Nathan J. B. Kraft et al. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS
- Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities
- (2010) Margaret M. Mayfield et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests
- (2009) Steven W. Kembel ECOLOGY LETTERS
- The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
- (2009) Jeannine Cavender-Bares et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- Phylogenetic Resolution and Quantifying the Phylogenetic Diversity and Dispersion of Communities
- (2009) Nathan G. Swenson PLoS One
- Competition for Light Causes Plant Biodiversity Loss After Eutrophication
- (2009) Y. Hautier et al. SCIENCE
- When Competition Does Not Matter: Grassland Diversity and Community Composition
- (2008) Eric G. Lamb et al. AMERICAN NATURALIST
- Shoot, but not root, competition reduces community diversity in experimental mesocosms
- (2008) Eric G. Lamb et al. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
- Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure
- (2008) S. M. VAMOSI et al. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
- Are soil lichen communities structured by biotic interactions? A null model analysis
- (2007) Fernando T. Maestre et al. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
- Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants?
- (2007) James F. Cahill et al. PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started