4.3 Article

Effect of sex ratio, habitat factors and neighborhood competition on stem growth in the dioecious tree Fraxinus mandshurica

Journal

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 309-317

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-013-1125-y

Keywords

Fraxinus mandshurica; Stem growth; Sex ratio; Causal model; Dioecious species

Categories

Funding

  1. 12th Five-Year National Science and Technology plan of China [2012BAC01B03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200315]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China [NCET-12-0781]
  4. Program of the Co-Construction
  5. Beijing Municipal Government of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth rates of male and female trees are often different in a dioecious species. In this study, we analyzed sex ratios and the effect of gender, neighborhood competition and habitat factors on the stem growth of dioecious Fraxinus mandshurica trees in a secondary conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest in the Changbai Mountains of northeastern China. The sex ratio in the 5.2-ha study area does not deviate significantly from the expected 1:1 ratio, except for trees in the large diameter classes. For dbh > 40 cm, the sex ratio is male-biased. This result suggests that males have a faster rate of stem growth than females, which is usually explained by the higher cost of reproduction in the fruit-bearing females. An analysis of the dbh distributions of two successive measurements showed that the rate of stem growth of the (27) females drops off with increasing dbh and remains below that of the (35) males. A causal model was used to analyze factors affecting the rate of stem growth, showing that these rates are affected significantly and positively by soil moisture and tree size in both genders and that within-gender competition is mainly for nitrogen. Our study suggests that neighborhood competition does not affect stem growth significantly, which is a rather surprising result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available