4.5 Article

Modeled phytoplankton diversity and productivity in the California Current System

Journal

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages 37-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.008

Keywords

Diversity; Shannon index; Species richness; Productivity; Phytoplankton; Model; California Current System

Categories

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1026607] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the phytoplankton community structure and the relationship between phytoplankton diversity and productivity produced by a self-emergent ecosystem model that represents a large number of phytoplankton type and is coupled to a circulation model of the California Current System. Biomass of each modeled phytoplankton type, when averaged over the uppermost model level and for 5-years, spans 7 orders of magnitude; 13 phytoplankton types contribute to the top 99.9% of community biomass, defining modeled species richness. Instantaneously, modeled species richness ranges between 1 and 17 while the Shannon index reaches values of 2.3. Diversity versus primary productivity shows large scatter with low species richness at both high and low productivity levels and a wide range of values including the maximum at intermediate productivities. Highest productivity and low diversity is found in the nearshore upwelling region dominated by fast growing diatoms; lowest productivity and low diversity occurs in deep, light-limited regions; and intermediate productivity and high diversity characterize offshore, oligotrophic surface waters. Locally averaged diversity and productivity covary in time with the sign of correlation dependent on geographic region as representing portions of the diversity-productivity scatter. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available