4.5 Article

Disruption to benthic habitats by moorings of wave energy installations: A modelling case study and implications for overall ecosystem functioning

Journal

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
Volume 245, Issue -, Pages 121-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.025

Keywords

Wave energy converter; Marine ecosystems; Bottom sediments; Suspended particulate matter; Indirect effects; Environmental impact assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E040136/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the research carried out in the marine renewables group of Heriot-Watt University, where the physical models of wave energy converters are first tested in the wave basin, and the results of their behaviour are then compared to the simulations performed using mathematical modelling. An OrcaFlex model is used to assess the scouring effect on bottom sediments and consequent disruption of benthic habitats, and open water tests are being conducted to compare the model performance with the actual observations. The output from OrcaFlex is then imported to Matlab, where the affected area is calculated using the time series of coordinates of touch down points of the mooring lines. The results show that the area of benthic habitats adversely affected by the leading mooring line on a typical wave energy converter (WEC) monotonically increases with the increase in wave height. In regular waves of 6 m height and 85 period, the area of benthic habitats adversely affected by the mooring lines may exceed 60 m(2). In addition to the direct effect on benthic habitats, sediment erosion by mooring lines will effect a whole range of ecosystem processes, e.g. due to changes in biogeochemical cycling and light penetration. These issues should be given a due consideration in calculations of ecological risks and EIA of any moored objects. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available