4.5 Article

Estimating the spatio-temporal risk of disease epidemics using a bioclimatic niche model

Journal

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
Volume 221, Issue 23, Pages 2828-2838

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.017

Keywords

CLIMEX; Forest management; Mycosphaerella leaf disease; Niche model; Pest risk assessment; Plant pathogen

Categories

Funding

  1. CRC for Forestry
  2. Australian Department of Climate Change [Batt-125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are presently few tools available for estimating epidemic risks from forest pathogens and hence informing pro-active disease management In this study we demonstrated that a bioclimatic niche model can be used to examine questions of epidemic risk in temperate eucalypt plantations The bioclimatic niche model CLIMEX was used to identify regional variation in climate suitability for Mycosphaerella leaf disease (MLD) a major cause of foliage damage in temperate eucalypt plantations around the world Using historical observations of MLD damage we were able to convert the relative score of climatic suitability generated by CLIMEX Into a severity ranking ranging from low to high providing for the first time a direct link between risk and impact and allowing us to explore disease severity in a way meaningful to forest managers We determined that the Compare Years function in CLIMEX could be used for site-specific risk assessment to identify severity frequency and seasonality of MLD epidemics We explored appropriate scales of risk assessment for forest managers Applying the CLIMEX model of MLD using a 0 25 or coarser grid size to areas of sharp topographic relief frequently misrepresented the risk posed by MLD because considerable variation occurred between individual forest sites encompassed within a single grid cell This highlighted the need for site-specific risk assessment to address many questions pertinent to managing risk in plantations Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available