4.7 Article

The economic relevance of sustainable agroforestry practices - An empirical analysis from Tanzania

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 86-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.008

Keywords

Agroforestry; Quantile regression; Logistic regression; Impact assessment; Tanzania

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) under the umbrella of the GIZ (former GTZ) project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the economic relevance of sustainable behavior of agroforestry practices for smallholders using the example of firewood exploitation in rural Tanzania. Three questions are addressed: (I) To what extent do households behave sustainably regarding firewood extraction from agroforestty? (2) Which factors determine the likelihood of households practicing sustainable agroforestty? (3) Are sustainably behaving households better off in terms of income compared to households practicing unsustainable agroforestry? The analysis is based on cross-sectional data of 314 households. A sustainability indicator shows that the share of sustainable households varies between 14 and 41% depending on the underlying wood growth rate. The results of the logistic regression indicate that property rights regarding the ownership of agricultural land and environmental awareness increase the likelihood of sustainable firewood extraction. Empirical evidence from the quantile regression reveals that poorest households generate higher income if they extract firewood unsustainably. The opposite is true for households of upper income percentiles. Thus, the poor are likely to increase environmental degradation to generate more income causing a 'downward spiral' of the poverty-environment trap resulting in income losses in the long run. Households with a per capita income of 524 TZS or more manage their tree stocks sustainably. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available