4.5 Article

Benchmarking Calculations of Excitonic Couplings between Bacteriochlorophylls

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 25-32

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08817

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DE140100433]
  2. Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems [CE110001013]
  3. Centre of Excellence for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology [CE110001027]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE140100433] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excitonic couplings between (bacterio)chlorophyll molecules are necessary for simulating energy transport in photosynthetic complexes. Many techniques for calculating the couplings are in use, from the simple (but inaccurate) point-dipole approximation to fully quantum-chemical methods. We compared several approximations to determine their range of applicability, noting that the propagation of experimental uncertainties poses a fundamental limit on the achievable accuracy. In particular, the uncertainty in crystallographic coordinates yields an uncertainty of about 20% in the calculated couplings. Because quantum-chemical corrections are smaller than 20% in most biologically relevant cases, their considerable computational cost is rarely justified. We therefore recommend the electrostatic TrEsp method across the entire range of molecular separations and orientations because its cost is minimal and it generally agrees with quantum-chemical calculations to better than the geometric uncertainty. Understanding these uncertainties can guard against striving for unrealistic precision; at the same time, detailed benchmarks can allow important qualitative questions-which do not depend on the precise values of the simulation parameters-to be addressed with greater confidence about the conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available