4.3 Article

The effects of skin-to-skin care on the diaphragmatic electrical activity in preterm infants

Journal

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 531-534

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.04.014

Keywords

Kangaroo care; Respiratory support; NAVA

Funding

  1. Maquet Critical Care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Skin-to-skin care (SSC) is widely used in neonatal intensive care units due to its positive effects on infant physiology and parent-infant interaction. Aims: We investigated the safety and the effect of SSC on the diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) in premature infants recovering from respiratory distress syndrome treated on noninvasive neurally adjusted respiratory assist. Study design: An observational cross-over study design was used. The infants were evaluated during SSC and in both prone and supine positions before and after SSC during a 9-hour study period. The EAdi was measured via miniaturized sensors incorporated into a feeding tube. Subjects: Seventeen premature infants with a mean age of 20 d (range, 2-43 d) were studied. Their mean birth weight was 900 g (490-1845 g) and mean gestational age at birth 28 wk (25-32 wk). Outcome measures: Under each condition, EAdi peak (representing tidal, neural inspiratory effort) and EAdi minimum (representing neural expiratory activity) were numerically quantified. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, and apnea were recorded. Results: The mean EAdi minimum values were lower during SSC and prone position. In addition, a tendency towards lower EAdi peak values was found during SSC There were no differences in the occurrence of apnea between the study phases. Conclusions: SSC is safe and it is not associated with increased neural activity of the diaphragm. On the contrary, low EAdi minimum values were registered reflecting more complete diaphragmatic de-activation between respiratory cycles. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available