4.5 Article

Folding Atomistic Proteins in Explicit Solvent Using Simulated Tempering

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 119, Issue 23, Pages 6941-6951

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03381

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GRAL ANR SIMI [12-BS07-0017-01]
  2. Pierre Gilles de Gennes Foundation
  3. DYNAMO [ANR-11-LABX-0011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following a previous report on a coarse-grained protein model in implicit solvent, we applied simulated tempering (ST) with on-the-fly Helmholtz free energy (weight factors) determination to the folding or aggregation of Seven. proteins with the CHARMM, OPLS, and AMBER protein, and the SPC and TIP3P water force fields.. For efficiency and reliability, we also performed replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations on the alanine di- and decapeptide, and the dimer of the A beta 16-22 Alzheimer's fragment, and used experimental data and previous simulation results on the chignolin, beta3s, Trp-cage, and WW domain peptides of 10-37 amino acids. The sampling with ST is found to be more efficient than with REMD for a much lower CPU cost. Starting from: unfolded Or extended conformations, the WW domain and the Trp-cage peptide fold to their NMR structures with a backbone RMSD of 2.0 and 1 angstrom. Remarkably, the ST simulation explores transient non-native topologies for Trp-cage that have been rarely discussed by other simulations. Our ST simulations also show that the CHARMM22* force field has limitations in describing accurately the beta3s peptide. Taken together, these results open the door to the study of the configurations of single proteins, protein aggregates, and any molecular systems at atomic details in explicit solvent using a single normal CPU. They also demonstrate that our ST scheme can be used with any force field ranging from quantum mechanics to coarse-grain and atomistic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available