4.7 Article

How to design proper π-spacer order of the D-π-A dyes for DSSCs? A density functional response

Journal

DYES AND PIGMENTS
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 313-321

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.05.020

Keywords

Organic dyes; Dye sensitized solar cells; Conjugation order; Vertical dipole moment; Charge recombination; DFT

Funding

  1. NSFC [20903020, 21131001]
  2. 973 Program [2009CB623605]
  3. SRF for ROCS, SEM
  4. Science and Technology Development Planning of Jilin Province [20090146]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011408]
  6. Opening Project of Key Laboratory for Chemistry of Low-Dimensional Materials of Jiangsu Province [JSKC10082]
  7. Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific Innovation Project of Huaiyin Normal University [11HSGJBZ11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three organic donor-pi-acceptor dyes 1-3 used for dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) with difference only in pi spacer sequence were investigated via density functional theory (OFT) and time-dependent OFT calculations to shed light on how the pi conjugation order influence the performance of the dyes. Key parameters in close connection with the open-circuit photovoltage (V-oc) and the short-circuit current density (J(sc)), including (i) light harvesting efficiency (LHE); (ii) injection driving force (Delta G(inject)): (iii) reorganization energy (lambda(reorg)); (iv) number of photoinjected electrons (n(c,inj)); (v) the extent of charge recombination, and (vi) vertical dipole moment (mu(normal)), were discussed. The theoretical results reveal that compared with dyes 1 and 2, dye 3 has the largest V-oc due to its largest mu(normal) and the slowest charge recombination. This conclusion is in good accordance with the experimental results and the theoretical criteria we used would be useful to design and fast screen other organic dyes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available