4.4 Article

Analytical characterization of three trifluoromethyl-substituted methcathinone isomers

Journal

DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 525-529

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/dta.382

Keywords

cathinones; aminopropiophenones; psychoactive; mass spectrometry; forensic; clinical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cathinone derivatives display a wide range of pharmacological activities and uses; some of them are used as prescription medicines, while others are encountered within a recreational context and are available without a prescription over the Internet and in retail shops around the world. One of the difficulties involved in the unambiguous identification of these new psychoactive substances is the lack of suitable reference standards, particularly when dealing with unreported derivatives and positional isomers. In order to address this need, three trifluoromethyl analogues of the psychostimulant methcathinone, with a CF3 substituent at the 2-, 3- and 4-position of the phenyl ring (2-TFMAP?1, 3-TFMAP?2 and 4-TFMAP?3), have been prepared for analytical characterization using ATR-FTIR, 1H and 13?C NMR, and GC-(EI/CI)-ion trap-MS. Differentiation among isomers was feasible by IR, for example when assessing the carbonyl stretch at 1711 (1), 1693 (2) and 1688 (3) cm-1, respectively. In addition to the expected iminium base peak at m/z 58, EI-MS displayed key ions at m/z 173, 145, 125, 95, and 75. Separation of isomers was possible under GC conditions. A characteristic feature under CI conditions was the loss of water from the [M?+?H]+ yielding m/z 214 in addition to m/z 58. Studies currently underway show that the three CF3-methcathinone analogues have central nervous system effects and that the 4-CF3 isomer 3 is more potent as a serotonin uptake inhibitor and releasing agent than the 3-CF3 and 2-CF3 counterparts. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available