4.4 Article

Design and characterization of enteric-coated controlled release mucoadhesive microcapsules of Rabeprazole sodium

Journal

DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 548-560

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2012.676047

Keywords

Gastric resistance; Mucoadhesion; Swelling index; In vitro drug release; Two-way ANOVA; In vivo antiulcer activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of present work was to design and characterize the rabeprazole sodium loaded microcapsules prepared by solvent evaporation technique using ethyl cellulose (EC) based various mucoadhesive polymer, followed by a triple coating with Eudragit L100. The Box-behnken design (BBD) was applied for optimization of formulations containing EC, HPMCK100M and Eudragit L100 as factors for selected responses like entrapment efficiency, mucoadhesive property and drug release in 24 h. The prepared microcapsules were characterized for particle size, drug content, swelling index, mucoadhesive strength, and in vivo antiulcer activity. FT-IR studies revealed that there was no drug-polymer interaction. SEM studies revealed that microcapsules were non-aggregated, spherical shape and smooth appearance. In vitro drug release data from microcapsules was fitted to different kinetic models to explain release profiles. The correlation coefficient value (r(2)) indicated that the drug release followed Higuchi model. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant difference in the release of drug from all formulations at p < 0.05 level. Accelerated stability study of optimized formulation (F4) upto 6 months showed there was no change in drug content and release characteristics during storage. In vivo antiulcer activity showed that the optimized microcapsules were able to protect rat stomach against ulcer formation vis-a-vis aqueous solution of the drug showed only negligible and minimum effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available