4.4 Article

Two-layered dissolving microneedles for percutaneous delivery of sumatriptan in rats

Journal

DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages 1387-1393

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2011.576426

Keywords

Dissolving microneedles; array chip; sumatriptan; bioavailability; transdermal delivery; rats

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel transdermal delivery of sumatriptan (ST) was attempted by application of dissolving microneedle (DM) technology. Dextran DM (d-DM) and hyaluronate DM (h-DM) were prepared by adding ST solution to dextran solution or hyaluronic acid solution. One DM chip, 1.0 x 1.0 cm, contains 100 microneedle arrays in a 10 x 10 matrix. The mean lengths of DMs were 496.6 +/- 2.9 mu m for h-DM and 494.5 +/- 1.3 mu m for d-DM. The diameters of the array basement were 295.9 +/- 3.9 mu m (d-DM) and 291.7 +/- 3.0 mu m (h-DM), where ST contents were 31.6 +/- 4.5 mu g and 24.1 +/- 0.9 mu g. These results suggest that ST was stable in h-DM. Each DM was administered to rat abdominal skin. The maximum plasma ST concentrations, C(max), and the areas under the plasma ST concentration versus time curves (AUC) were 44.6 +/- 4.9 ng/ml and 24.6 +/- 3.9 ng . h/ml for h-DM and 38.4 +/- 2.7 ng/ml and 14.1 +/- 1.5 ng . h/ml for d-DM. The bioavailabilities of ST from DMs were calculated as 100.7 +/- 18.8% for h-DM and 93.6 +/- 10.2% for d-DM. Good dose dependency was observed on C(max) and AUC. The stability study of ST in DM was performed for 3 months under four different conditions, -80, 4, 23, and 50 degrees C. At the end of incubation period, they were, respectively, 100.0 +/- 0.3%, 97.8 +/- 0.2%, 98.8 +/- 0.2%, and 100.7 +/- 0.1%. These suggest the usefulness of DM as a noninvaisive transdermal delivery system of ST to migraine therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available