4.5 Review

Postoperative Issues of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Systematic Literature Review and Treatment Guideline

Journal

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
Volume 54, Issue 11, Pages 1443-1460

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318227f65d

Keywords

Sacral nerve stimulation; Fecal incontinence; Constipation; Complications; Adverse effects

Funding

  1. Medtronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge on the incidence and management of suboptimal therapeutic effect and the complications associated with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review current literature on postoperative issues and to propose a treatment algorithm. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched using the keywords sacral nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, fecal incontinence, and constipation for English-language articles published from January 1980 to August 2010. A further search was conducted on a wider literature using the keywords complication, adverse effect, treatment failure, equipment failure, infection, foreign-body migration, reoperation, pain, and algorithm. STUDY SELECTION: Four hundred sixty-one titles were identified, and after a title and abstract review, 135 were subjected to full article review; 89 were finally included in this review. Five articles were added by manual search and consensus. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were identified as cohort studies reporting on postoperative issues, including 1661 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation and 1600 patients who proceeded to sacral nerve stimulation therapy. Pooled data showed that the most common problem during percutaneous nerve evaluation was lead displacement (5.3%). The incidence of suboptimal outcome, pain, and infection after implantation was 12.1%, 13.0%, and 3.9%. LIMITATIONS: There was significant underreporting of untoward events, because 60% of the studies did not report complications during percutaneous nerve evaluation, and suboptimal outcome after implantation was not disclosed in 44% of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of untoward events associated with sacral nerve stimulation appears to be low. However, there is a significant underreporting of the incidence. Using the information from the structured and systematic literature review, we formulated a clinically relevant guideline for reporting and managing postoperative issues. The guideline can provide a framework for clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available