4.2 Article

CRUDE OIL GEOCHEMISTRY AND SOURCE ROCK POTENTIAL OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS - EOCENE SUCCESSION IN THE BELAYIM OILFIELDS, CENTRAL GULF OF SUEZ, EGYPT

Journal

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 193-215

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpg.12606

Keywords

Belayim oilfields; Gulf of Suez; Egypt; source rocks; petroleum potential; Thebes Formation; Brown Limestone Formation; Matulla Formation; palynofacies; biomarkers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the petroleum potential of source rocks in the pre-rift Upper Cretaceous - Eocene succession at the Belayim oilfields in the central Gulf of Suez Basin. Organic geochemical and palynofacies investigations were carried out on 65 cuttings samples collected from the Thebes, Brown Limestone and Matulla Formations. Analytical methods included Rock-Eval pyrolysis, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry. Four crude oil samples from producing wells were characterised using C-7 light hydrocarbons, stable carbon isotopes and biomarker characteristics. The results showed that the studied source rocks are composed of marine carbonates with organic matter dominated by algae and bacteria with minimal terrigenous input, deposited under reducing conditions. This conclusion was supported by n-alkane distributions, pristane/ phytane ratios, homohopane and gammacerane indices, high concentrations of cholestane, the presence of C-30 n-propylcholestanes, and low diasterane ratios. The source rocks ranged from immature to marginally mature based on the Rock-Eval T-max together with biomarker maturity parameters. The analysed crude oil samples are interpreted to have been derived from source rock intervals within the Eocene Thebes Formation and the Upper Cretaceous Brown Limestone. The similarity in the geochemical characteristics of the crude oils suggests that there was little variation in the organofacies of the source rocks from which they were derived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available