4.3 Article

Maternal and fetal outcomes following unplanned conversion to general anesthetic at elective cesarean section

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 695-699

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.62

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R24HD047879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors predicting unplanned conversion to general anesthesia during elective cesarean section, and to examine maternal and fetal outcomes associated with unplanned conversion compared with other modes of anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort at a UK center (2008 to 2013). Women (4337) underwent elective cesarean section. Delivery outcomes were compared according to anesthesia type using logistic regression. RESULT: Women (1.6%) underwent unplanned conversion to general anesthetic. Unplanned conversion was associated with higher parity (odds ratio (OR) 3.82, confidence interval (CI; (1.58 to 9.62)) and maternal age >= 40 (OR 4.40, CI (1.08 to 29.88)). Compared with spinal anesthetic, unplanned conversion was associated with increased likelihood of maternal hemorrhage >= 1.5 l (OR 5.74, CI (1.90 to 14.01)) and delayed neonatal respiration (OR 4.76, CI (1.76 to 11.05)). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more likely compared with planned general anesthetic. CONCLUSION: Higher parity and maternal age are risk factors for unplanned conversion to general anesthetic. There is no increase in the likelihood of adverse outcomes with unplanned versus planned general anesthetic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Letter Anesthesiology

Collecting data for quality improvement in obstetric anaesthesia

N. Pritchard, Q. Lo, M. Wikner, J. Bamber

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA (2019)

Article Anesthesiology

The identification of key indicators to drive quality improvement in obstetric anaesthesia: results of the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association/National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit collaborative Delphi project

J. H. Bamber, D. N. Lucas, F. Plaat, B. Allin, M. Knight, K. Hinshaw, K. Kuntumalla, Q. Lo, S. Stanford, G. Stocks, T. Tanqueray, M. Wikner

ANAESTHESIA (2020)

Letter Anesthesiology

COVID-19 and access to labour epidural analgesia in UK hospitals

J. H. Bamber, D. N. Lucas

ANAESTHESIA (2020)

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Covid-19: Each discarded face mask is a potential biohazard

James H. Bamber, Tracey Christmas

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)

Article Anesthesiology

Obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK: a descriptive analysis of the National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database 2009-14

James H. Bamber, Dominique N. Lucas, Felicity Plaat, Robin Russell

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA (2020)

Review Anesthesiology

Pandemics and maternal health: the indirect effects of COVID-19

D. N. Lucas, J. H. Bamber

Summary: Infectious diseases like COVID-19 can have different direct impacts on men and women, with higher case fatality rates observed in men. However, the organizational changes in healthcare delivery to protect vulnerable groups may have indirect consequences, particularly for pregnant women.

ANAESTHESIA (2021)

Letter Anesthesiology

Temporal trends in post-dural puncture headache

J. H. Bamber, A. Hassan

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA (2021)

Letter Anesthesiology

Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021

D. N. Lucas, R. Russell, J. H. Bamber, C. D. Elton

ANAESTHESIA (2021)

Letter Anesthesiology

Prophylactic tranexamic acid at delivery: if not now, when?

J. H. Bamber, I. A. M. Ali

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA (2022)

Letter Anesthesiology

A health data strategy for the NHS, but where is anaesthesia?

J. Bamber, D. N. Lucas

ANAESTHESIA (2022)

Article Anesthesiology

The delivery of obstetric anaesthetic care in UK maternity units: a survey of practice in 2021

J. H. Bamber, D. N. Lucas, R. Russell

Summary: This study examined the resources and organization of obstetric anaesthetic care in the UK. The results showed significant disparities between the provision of obstetric anaesthesia services and national recommendations regarding consultant staffing, support for elective caesarean section lists, antenatal anaesthetic clinics, and consultant support for service development. There was also wide national variation in service provision.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA (2023)

Article Anesthesiology

A national cohort study to investigate the association between ethnicity and the provision of care in obstetric anaesthesia in England between 2011 and 2021

J. H. Bamber, R. Goldacre, D. N. Lucas, S. Quasim, M. Knight

Summary: Ethnic inequalities exist in obstetric anaesthetic care in the UK, with black women more likely to receive general anaesthesia during caesarean section births and Asian women less likely to receive neuraxial anaesthesia during vaginal births. Further research is needed to understand the causes of these disparities and to address potential remediable factors such as access to appropriate care.

ANAESTHESIA (2023)

Letter Anesthesiology

Recent studies on racial disparities in obstetric care in the USA: a reply

J. H. Bamber, D. N. Lucas

ANAESTHESIA (2023)

Editorial Material Anesthesiology

Why anaesthetists should care about postnatal care

J. H. Bamber

ANAESTHESIA (2023)

No Data Available