4.4 Article

Stroke family caregivers' support needs change across the care continuum: a qualitative study using the timing it right framework

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 315-324

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.691937

Keywords

Caregiver; stroke; social support; education; health service delivery

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Long-term Care
  2. CIHR Strategic Training Initiative in Health Care Technology and Place
  3. University of Toronto Mary Trimmer Chair in Geriatric Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Family caregivers provide essential support as stroke survivors' return to community living, but it is not standard clinical practice to prepare or provide ongoing support for their care-giving role. In addition, health care professionals (HCPs) experiences with providing support to caregivers have not been explored previously. The objectives of this qualitative study were to: (1) explore the support needs over time from the perspective of caregivers, (2) explore the support needs over time from the perspective of HCPs, and (3) compare and contrast caregivers' and HCPs' perspectives. Methods: A qualitative study with stroke family caregivers (n = 24) and HCPs (n = 14). In-depth interviews were audio taped, transcribed, and analyzed using Framework Analysis. Results: Three main themes emerged concerning: (1) types and intensity of support needed; (2) who provides support and the method of providing support; and (3) primary focus of care. These themes are discussed in relation to the TIR framework. Conclusions: Caregivers' needs for support and the individuals most suited to providing support change across the stroke survivor's recovery trajectory. Changes to service delivery to better support caregivers may include: (1) addressing caregivers' changing needs across the care continuum; (2) implementing a family-centered model of care; and (3) providing 7-day per week inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available