4.4 Article

Manual dexterity and related functional limitations in Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy. An explorative study

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 634-638

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638280701400755

Keywords

Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathies; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; upper extremity; hand; activities of daily living

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To explore impairments in manual dexterity and perceived limitations in upper extremity-related activities in subjects with Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy (HMSN). Method. Cross-sectional study of 20 HMSN subjects. Manual dexterity was assessed using the Jebsen test of hand function. Perceived limitations were assessed using the Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Results. Impaired manual dexterity was found in four out of seven Jebsen sub-tests. Turning over cards, lifting large light and large heavy objects were most impaired, as reflected by median z scores of 5.7, 12.0 and 16.9, respectively. Perceived limitations, as reflected by median and percentile (P25; P75) sum-scores, were 7.5 (3; 11.7) for the RAP domains of personal care (scale 0-69) and 6.0 (1.25; 15.5) for the domains of occupation (scale 0-42). The median (P25; P75) DASH score (scale 0-100) was 13.3 (2.7; 48.1). Jebsen test scores were significantly associated with RAP and DASH scores. Conclusions. Manual dexterity of HMSN subjects, especially requiring the manipulation of flat and of large objects, was impaired and associated with the amount of perceived limitations in upper extremity function. Major limitations were perceived in activities related to upper extremity function by 25% of HMSN subjects. Measurement of manual dexterity and perceived limitations should be incorporated into the evaluation and treatment of HMSN subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available