4.5 Article

Dose optimization is effective in ulcerative colitis patients losing response to infliximab: A collaborative multicentre retrospective study

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 135-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.10.007

Keywords

Dose optimization; Infliximab; Loss of response; Ulcerative colitis

Funding

  1. Menarini
  2. ASTRAZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Subjects maintained on infliximab scheduled therapy for inflammatory bowel disease may require dose optimization due to secondary loss of response. There are limited data on infliximab dose optimization for ulcerative colitis. Aims: To investigate dose optimization in ulcerative colitis patients with secondary loss of response. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre study. Primary outcome was rapid clinical response assessed at the next administration of infliximab after dose intensification. Secondary outcomes were rapid clinical remission, and clinical response, remission and colectomy rate by week 52. Doubling the dose (10 mg/kg q8 weeks) vs. shortening the dose interval (5 mg/kg every 6 or 4 weeks) were compared. Results: Forty-one patients from eight centres were enrolled (15 for double dose and 26 for interval shortening). Rapid response was achieved in 37/41 patients (90.2%), while 19/41 (46.3%) achieved rapid clinical remission. At week 52, 28/41 patients were maintained in clinical remission, but 4 (9.8%) underwent colectomy. No difference was found between the two optimization strategies. Subjects achieving rapid clinical response had a significantly higher colectomy-free rate at week 52 (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Dose optimization of infliximab was effective to restore clinical response or remission and to prevent colectomy in ulcerative colitis patients with secondary loss of response. (C) 2013 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available