4.5 Article

Long-term effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation for solitary small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 363 patients

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 336-341

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.10.022

Keywords

Cirrhosis; Liver tumour ablation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Radiofrequency Ablation is the most widely performed percutaneous treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. This multicentre study was aimed at assessing the complication, overall survival and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic patients with single Hepatocellular Carcinoma nodule <= 3 cm undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation. Methods: Data of 365 patients (59% males; mean age 67 +/- 8 years), Child-Pugh A/B, with single Hepatocellular Carcinoma nodule <= 3 cm (tumours >2-3 cm = 127/236), showing complete necrosis after Radiofrequency Ablation between 1998 and 2010 in 7 Italian Centers were retrospectively reviewed. Complication, overall survival and disease-free survival rates were analyzed as main clinical end-points. Results: Major complications were observed in 8 patients (2.2%) and minor complications in 23 patients (6.3%). The 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 80% and 64%. One hundred and seven patients (29.5%) died, being 41 deaths (38.3%) Hepatocellular Carcinoma-related. At multivariate analysis only age (p = 0.04; OR 2.29), ascites (p < 0.001; OR 3.74) and Child-Pugh class >= B8 (p = 0.003; OR 2.42) were confirmed as independent predictors for overall survival. The disease-free survival rates at 3- and 5-year were 50%, and 41.8%. Conclusions: Radiofrequency Ablation is an effective and safe tool for the treatment of single Hepatocellular Carcinoma <= 3 cm providing excellent 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates. Patient's age and liver status appeared as main determinants of outcome. (C) 2012 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available