4.4 Article

Anal endosonography and bowel function in patients undergoing different types of endorectal pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 1341-1346

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.12.024

Keywords

Hirschsprung disease; Anal endosonography; Anal manometry; Anal sphincter; Postoperative fecal incontinence

Funding

  1. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  2. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on solid tumours in children (KSSB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The reasons for fecal incontinence after surgery for Hirschsprung disease (HD) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the anal sphincters by anal endosonography and manometry after transanal endorectal pull-through, with or without laparotomy or laparoscopy, in HD patients. Furthermore, we aimed to correlate these findings to bowel function. Patients and methods: Fifty-two HD patients were followed after endorectal pull-through. Anal endosonography and manometry were performed without sedation at the age of 3 to 16 years. Results: Endosonographic internal anal sphincter (IAS) defects were found in 24/50 patients, more frequently after transanal than transabdominal procedures (69 vs. 19%, p = 0.001). In a multiple variable logistic regression model, operative approach was the only significant predictor for IAS defects. Anal resting pressure (median 40 mm Hg, range 15-120) was not correlated to presence of IAS defects. Daily fecal incontinence occurred more often in patients with IAS defects (54 vs. 25%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Postoperative IAS defects were frequently detected and were associated with daily fecal incontinence. IAS defects occurred more often after solely transanal procedures. We propose that these surgical approaches are compared in a randomized controlled trial before solely transanal endorectal pull-through is performed as a routine procedure. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available