4.4 Article

Risk factors for mortality in patients with multifocal and diffuse hepatic hemangiomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 837-841

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.056

Keywords

Hepatic hemangioma; Infantile hemangioma; Liver hemangioma; Vascular anomaly

Funding

  1. Stuart and Jane Weitzman Fellowship in Vascular Anomalies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Multifocal and diffuse hepatic hemangiomas are true infantile hemangiomas, which likely exist in a continuum. We reviewed our hepatic hemangioma registry to identify prognostic indicators for mortality. Methods: Registry records entered between 1995 and 2012 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics were evaluated for prognostic significance using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Results: We identified 123 patients with multifocal (n = 91) and diffuse (n = 32) hepatic hemangiomas. Mortality was 16% (n = 20); 40% (n = 8) had multifocal and 60% (n = 12) had diffuse lesions. A diagnosis of diffuse disease (hazard ratio: 9.9, 95% CI: 2.0-50.8, P =.002) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (hazard ratio: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3-14.2, P =.031) were significant risk factors for mortality across the continuum; age at presentation, cardiomegaly, presence of shunts, and hypothyroidism were not statistically significant independent risk factors. Among patients with diffuse lesions, eight (67%) who died had abdominal compartment syndrome, which was also associated with mortality (P =.002). Conclusions: Hepatic hemangioma patients with CHF or diffuse disease are at higher risk for mortality. Patients with multifocal lesions without CHF may go undetected until lesions become diffuse. Aggressive treatment of symptomatic patients and close follow-up of asymptomatic patients may improve mortality. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available