Journal
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 719-725Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dc.23048
Keywords
pancreas; cytology supernatant; mutational analysis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Diagnosis of fine-needle aspirations of pancreatic solid masses is complicated by many factors that keep its false-negative rate high. Our novel approach analyzes cell-free cytocentrifugation supernatant, currently a discarded portion of the specimen. Supernatant and cytology slides were collected from 25 patients: 11 cases with confirmed outcome [five positive (adenocarcinoma) and six negative (inflammatory states)], plus 14 without confirmed outcomes. Slides were microdissected, DNA was extracted from microdissections and corresponding supernatants, and all were analyzed for KRAS point mutation and loss of heterozygosity. Notably, higher levels of free DNA were found in supernatants than in corresponding microdissected cells. Supernatants contained sufficient DNA for mutational profiling even when samples contained few to no cells. Mutations were present in 5/5 malignancies and no mutations were present in inflammatory states. In conclusion, these findings support using supernatant for mutational genotyping when diagnostic confirmation is required for pancreatic solid masses. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available