4.1 Article

Scoring System for Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma and Reactive Mesothelial Cells on Cytology Specimens

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages 885-890

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21128

Keywords

mesothelioma; reactive mesothelial cells; scoring system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytology is the only useful tool in the detection of malignant mesothelioma (MM) at an early stage. No other methods, such as immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy, are available to distinguish MM torn reactive mesothelial cells (RMC). Some objective analysis of cytology specimens is necessary. On the basis of our case review and cytological features described in previous articles. we developed a scoring system for malignant mesothelioma (SSMM) of effusion cytology to distinguish MM cells from RMC. Mesothelioma cells in effusions from 22 patients (20 pleural and 2 peritoneal mesotheliomas) were compared with RMC from 20 patients without obvious tumor cells and 50 effusions containing metastatic carcinoma cells. The SSMM is based on characteristic features of mesothelial and malignant cells. The total achievable score is 10 points: one point each is given for variety of cell size, cyanophilic cytoplasm with villosity/windows/bleb, sheet-like arrangement, mirror-ball-like cell clusters, nuclear atypia, and cannibalism, respectively. Further two points each are ascribed for acidophilic large nucleoli and multinucleated cells with snore than eight nuclei. The total score fir each of the 22 mesotheliomas was more than 5 points. On the other hand, all RMC and the 50 metastatic carcinoma cases scored less than 3 points, aside front two cases that mere treated with OK432. No single characteristic feature was observed to be consistent within the 22 mesotheliomas analyzed. Ancillary use of immunocytochemistry, such as podoplanin (D2-40) and calretinin, supported the diagnostic accuracy of the SSMM. SSMM is useful for the differential diagnosis of MM. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009;37:885-890. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available