4.5 Article

Low-grade inflammation in young adults exposed to intrauterine hyperglycemia

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 322-330

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.023

Keywords

Inflammatory markers; Intrauterine programming; Intrauterine hyperglycemia; Gestational diabetes; Long term consequences

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Aase and Ejner Danielsens Fondation
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  4. Civilingenioer H.C. Bechgaard's Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To investigate associations between fetal exposure to intrauterine hyperglycemia and plasma concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in adult offspring. Method: We studied 597 offspring, aged 18-27 years, from four different groups concerning exposure to intrauterine hyperglycemia and genetic predisposition to type 2 diabetes (offspring of women with: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), risk factors for GDM but normal glucose tolerance, type 1 diabetes and women from the background population, respectively). The participants were characterized by fasting plasma levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test and anthropometric measurements. Results: No association between intrauterine exposure to hyperglycemia and levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP in the offspring was found. In contrast maternal overweight (body mass index >= 25 kg/m(2)) was positively associated with levels of both IL-6 and hs-CRP (p for both = 0.003). Offspring who had already developed overweight or conditions of abnormal glucose tolerance were characterized by higher levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP compared with the remaining offspring (all p < 0.007). Conclusion: Maternal overweight but not exposure to intrauterine hyperglycemia was associated with low-grade inflammation in adult offspring. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available