4.5 Article

Postprandial metabolic responses to mixed versus liquid meal tests in healthy men and men with type 2 diabetes

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 449-455

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.002

Keywords

Meal tolerance test; Beta-cell function; Insulin sensitivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Compare metabolic responses after mixed versus liquid meals of similar caloric/nutritional content in healthy and type 2 diabetes (T2D) subjects. Methods: Ten healthy men and 10 men with T2D received mixed and liquid meals after an overnight fast. Classical (insulinogenic index; insulin/glucose areas under curves, AUC(insulin)/AUC(glucose)) and model-based (beta-cell glucose sensitivity; rate sensitivity; potentiation factor ratio, PFR) beta-cell function estimates were calculated. Between-meal differences in glucose, insulin, C-peptide, triglyceride (TG), beta-cell function and oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS) and between-meal correlations for beta-cell function and OGIS were evaluated. Results: Among healthy subjects, beta-cell function and OGIS were similar between meals. C-peptide (p = 0.03), insulin (p = 0.002), AUC(insulin)/AUC(glucose) (p = 0.004) and insulin secretion (p = 0.04) were higher after the liquid meal. Among T2D subjects, glucose, insulin, C-peptide, beta-cell function, and OGIS were similar. PFR was higher (p = 0.004) and TG increased more slowly (p = 0.002) after the liquid meal. OGIS and beta-cell function were correlated during both meals in both groups (r = 0.66-0.98), except incremental AUC(insulin)/AUC(glucose), rate sensitivity, and, in healthy subjects, PFR. Conclusions: Metabolic responses after mixed or liquid meals of similar content were highly correlated in T2D and healthy subjects. In T2D, the liquid meal produced beta-cell function estimates generally similar to the mixed meal. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available