4.5 Article

Type 2 diabetes risk in persons with dysglycemia: The Framingham Offspring Study

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 124-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.12.024

Keywords

Dysglycemia; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Prospective cohort study; Risk prediction; Metabolic syndrome

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [K24 DK080140, K24 DK080140-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Detection of risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among adults with dysglycemia. Methods: We used a nested case-cohort prospective design to estimate risk of new diabetes (diabetes treatment or FPG >= 7.0 mmol/L) among 1004 Framingham Heart Study Offspring with baseline dysglycemia [ fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 5.4-6.9 mmol/L and/or 2-h post glucose load level 7.8-11.0 mmol/L]. Using clinical characteristics previously shown to predict incident T2DM, we used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR), p-values for predictors, and assessment of model discrimination. Results: At the end of 7 years follow-up there were 118 incident T2DM cases. In a model that included age, sex, elevated blood pressure or blood pressure treatment, lipid-lowering treatment and elevated triglycerides, we found the following additional characteristics to be independently associated with new T2DM: parental history of diabetes (OR 2.28, p = 0.004); excess adiposity (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) or waist circumference >= 101.6 cm) (OR 2.04, p = 0.0005), and low HDL-C [<1.0 (men) or <1.3 mmol/L (women)] (OR 2.77, p < 0.0001). The multivariable C-statistic for this model was 0.701, and with glycemic category information included, c = 0.751. Conclusions: The key non-glycemic traits that predicted later T2DM in adults with dysglycemia were parental history of diabetes, excess adiposity and low HDL-C. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available