4.5 Article

Hyperglycemia on admission predicts larger infarct size in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 97-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.001

Keywords

Hyperglycemia; Diabetes; Infarct size; SPECT

Funding

  1. Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation, Osaka, Japan
  2. Spanish Society of Cardiology [2007]
  3. Medtronic Iberia S.A.
  4. Health Manpower Development Program Fellowship
  5. National Medical Research Council Medical Research Fellowship, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To determine if hyperglycemia on admission correlates to infarct size measured by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We evaluated 347 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. Infarct size was determined by SPECT on Day 5. The population was divided into: hyperglycemia (glycemia on admission >11 mmol/L) or non-hyperglycemia (<= 11 mmol/L) regardless of diabetic status. Results: 61 (17.6%) patients presented with hyperglycemia on admission. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or in PCI characteristics between the two groups. Final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 81.7% of patients with hyperglycemia vs 85.7% of patients with non-hyperglycemia (p = 0.43). The infarct size was larger in the hyperglycemia group (6 [2-14]% vs 8.5 [3-18.25]%; p = 0.016). A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that hyperglycemia on admission was an independent predictor of infarct size at Day 5 post-MI (p = 0.004). Conclusion: In patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, hyperglycemia on admission is associated with larger infarct size determined by SPECT. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available