4.5 Article

Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among extremely obese adolescents in Italy and Germany

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 14-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.008

Keywords

Adolescent obesity; Metabolic syndrome; Multivariate binary logistic regression; European Union

Funding

  1. Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Juvenile metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing major medical problem in industrialised countries. We estimated its prevalence among two similar clinic-based sequentially recruited cohorts of extremely obese adolescents (age: 12-18 years) from Italy (N = 665, males = 271, females = 394) and Germany (N = 661, males = 261, females = 400) using the recent IDF paediatric criteria. The prevalence of the MetS was 23.3% among the Italians and 40.4% among the Germans. A multivariate logistic regression revealed an increased risk related to age (adjusted odd ratio (AOR): 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59-3.16; p < 0.001), BMI SDS (AOR: 3.61; 95% CI: 2.33-5.60; p < 0.001), male gender (AOR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.80-3.10; p < 0.001), and in German adolescents (AOR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.98-3.31; p < 0.001). Among Italian adolescents having the MetS, 83% had 3 abnormalities, 16% had 4 abnormalities while less than 1% had all the 5 abnormalities. In the German cohort, 67%, 28% and 5% of affected individuals had 3,4 and 5 abnormalities, respectively. These results indicate that MetS is highly prevalent among extremely obese adolescents, and suggest that (besides age, obesity and gender) national sociocultural factors, as alimentary trends, could be important. Further tools should be developed to understand international epidemiological differences concerning obesity and its comorbidities in relation to lifestyles in the countries of European Union. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available