4.5 Article

Glycemic instability in type 1 diabetic patients: Possible role of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages 190-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.04.009

Keywords

ketosis; glycemic instability; C-peptide; type 1 diabetes

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: In type 1 diabetic patients, some have glycemic instability while others glycemic stability. We have developed criteria for evaluating glycemic instability and investigated the factors responsible. Methods: Glycemic instability in 52 type 1 diabetic patients was assessed by the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) and M-value, and clinical characteristics of good, fair and poor control groups were compared. Results: The median MAGE and M-value was 6.6 mmol/L and 18.7, respectively. Then MAGE >= 6.6 mmol/L and M-value >= 18.7 was defined as poor control. In the 32 patients without detectable C-peptide levels, 18 patients (56%) showed poor control. The frequency of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes was dramatically higher in the poor control group not only in the patients as a whole but also in those without detectable C-peptide levels. Conclusions: A decreased level of C-peptide is a significant factor in glycemic instability. However, some patients have glycemic stability though beta-cell function is completely depleted. The presence of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes may be a factor in later glycemic instability, suggesting the importance of examining patients in detail at onset of diabetes for careful follow-up to prevent progression of acute and chronic complications of diabetes. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available