4.7 Review

The targeting of β-cells by T lymphocytes in human type 1 diabetes: clinical perspectives

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 89-97

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12159

Keywords

autoimmunity; ICOS; insulin; T lymphocytes; type 1 diabetes

Funding

  1. ANR [YES-2011]
  2. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD/JDRF/Novo Nordisk European Program in Type 1 Diabetes Research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review focuses on genes that control beta-cell targeting in autoimmune, type 1-dependent, diabetes (T1D) and on insulin as the major autoantigen recognized by T lymphocytes throughout the disease process. T1D associates with multiple gene variants. Beyond genes that predispose to general failure of immune tolerance to self, loci identified by the analysis of crosses between non-obese diabetic (NOD) and conventional mouse strains harbour genes that control beta-cell targeting or the deviation of autoimmunity towards other tissues. We report here the role of genes encoding co-activation molecules involved in the activation of T lymphocytes, ICOS and ICOS ligand (B7RP1). NOD mice which are deficient in either of these two molecules are protected from diabetes, but instead develop a neuromuscular autoimmune disease. We also report the characterization in humans of T lymphocytes that are specific for major beta-cell autoantigens, especially insulin. This opens the way towards new bioassays in the diagnosis of autoimmunity and towards autoantigen-specific immunotherapy in T1D. In order to develop a new preclinical model of T1D that would allow testing insulin epitopes to induce immune tolerance in vivo, we developed a mouse that is deficient in endogenous major histocompatibility complex class I and class II genes and deficient for the two murine insulin genes and that express human class I, class II and insulin genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available