4.3 Article

Validation of a multi-marker model for the prediction of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: Combined results of the Inter99 and Botnia studies

Journal

DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 59-67

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479164111424762

Keywords

Biomarkers; Diabetes Risk Score; incident diabetes; risk assessment; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  2. Folkhalsan Foundation
  3. Finnish Diabetes Research Association
  4. Nordic Centre of Excellence in Disease Genetics
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. Danish Medical Research Council
  7. Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment
  8. Novo Nordisk
  9. Copenhagen County
  10. Danish Heart Foundation
  11. Danish Pharmaceutical Association
  12. Augustinus Foundation
  13. Ib Henriksen Foundation
  14. Becket Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To assess performance of a biomarker-based score that predicts the five-year risk of diabetes (Diabetes Risk Score, DRS) in an independent cohort that included 15-year follow-up. Method: DRS was developed on the Inter99 cohort, and validated on the Botnia cohort. Performance was benchmarked against other risk-assessment tools comparing calibration, time to event analysis, and net reclassification. Results: The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.84 for the Inter99 cohort and 0.78 for the Botnia cohort. In the Botnia cohort, DRS provided better discrimination than fasting plasma glucose (FPG), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, oral glucose tolerance test or risk scores derived from Framingham or San Antonio Study cohorts. Overall reclassification with DRS was significantly better than using FPG and glucose tolerance status (p < 0.0001). In time to event analysis, rates of conversion to diabetes in low, moderate, and high DRS groups were significantly different (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study validates DRS performance in an independent population, and provides a more accurate assessment of T2DM risk than other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available