4.5 Article

Validation of the Japanese Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 718-723

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.014

Keywords

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System; Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised; symptom assessment; validity; reliability; validation

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08831, 24590831] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) is a brief and widely used symptom measurement tool. Objectives. To validate the Japanese version of the ESAS-r in Japanese patients with cancer. Methods. We assessed the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and known-group validity in 292 Japanese adult patients with cancer. They completed Japanese versions of the ESAS-r, M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. Results. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Japanese version of the ESAS-r was 0.87. The intraclass correlation coefficient in the test-retest examination ranged from 0.82 to 0.91 for each symptom score and was 0.90 for the total score. Pearson correlation coefficients of each ESAS-r symptom score with corresponding M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 items ranged from 0.45 to 0.80. The total score of the ESAS-r was significantly higher in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2-4 than in those with a performance status of 0 and 1 (P < 0.0001). Conclusion. The Japanese version of the ESAS-r is a reliable and valid tool for measuring symptoms in Japanese adult patients with cancer. (C) 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available