4.7 Article

mTORC1-Independent Reduction of Retinal Protein Synthesis in Type 1 Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 63, Issue 9, Pages 3077-3090

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db14-0235

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY-020895, DK-13499, DK-15658, EY-20582, DK-094292, DK-097153]
  2. A. Alfred Taubman Medical Research Institute
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness Physician-Scientist Award
  4. American Diabetes Association [1-04-RA-31]
  5. Core Center for Vision Research - National Eye Institute [EY-007003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poorly controlled diabetes has long been known as a catabolic disorder with profound loss of muscle and fat body mass resulting from a simultaneous reduction in protein synthesis and enhanced protein degradation. By contrast, retinal structure is largely maintained during diabetes despite reduced Akt activity and increased rate of cell death. Therefore, we hypothesized that retinal protein turnover is regulated differently than in other insulin-sensitive tissues, such as skeletal muscle. Ins2(Akita) diabetic mice and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats exhibited marked reductions in retinal protein synthesis matched by a concomitant reduction in retinal protein degradation associated with preserved retinal mass and protein content. The reduction in protein synthesis depended on both hyperglycemia and insulin deficiency, but protein degradation was only reversed by normalization of hyperglycemia. The reduction in protein synthesis was associated with diminished protein translation efficiency but, surprisingly, not with reduced activity of the mTORC1/S6K1/4E-BP1 pathway. Instead, diabetes induced a specific reduction of mTORC2 complex activity. These findings reveal distinctive responses of diabetes-induced retinal protein turnover compared with muscle and liver that may provide a new means to ameliorate diabetic retinopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available