4.3 Article

A unique missense allele of BAF155, a core BAF chromatin remodeling complex protein, causes neural tube closure defects in mice

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 483-497

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22142

Keywords

neural tube defect; apoptosis; proliferation; Baf155msp3; epigenetic regulation

Funding

  1. Department of Pediatrics, a Cancer Center Support [P30CA046934]
  2. Bioinformatics Shared Resource
  3. CCTSI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Failure of embryonic neural tube closure results in the second most common class of birth defects known as neural tube defects (NTDs). While NTDs are likely the result of complex multigenic dysfunction, it is not known whether polymorphisms in epigenetic regulators may be risk factors for NTDs. Here we characterized Baf155(msp3), a unique ENU-induced allele in mice. Homozygous Baf155(mps3) embryos exhibit highly penetrant exencephaly, allowing us to investigate the roles of an assembled, but malfunctional BAF chromatin remodeling complex in vivo at the time of neural tube closure. Evidence of defects in proliferation and apoptosis were found within the neural tube. RNA-Seq analysis revealed that surprisingly few genes showed altered expression in Baf155 mutant neural tissue, given the broad epigenetic role of the BAF complex, but included genes involved in neural development and cell survival. Moreover, gene expression changes between individual mutants were variable even though the NTD was consistently observed. This suggests that inconsistent gene regulation contributes to failed neural tube closure. These results shed light on the role of the BAF complex in the process of neural tube closure and highlight the importance of studying missense alleles to understand epigenetic regulation during critical phases of development. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 74: 483-497, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available