4.3 Article

Effects of Long-Pulsed 1,064-nm Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser on Dermal Collagen Remodeling in Hairless Mice

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 985-992

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02374.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government [2011-0001390]
  3. NRF
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0002431]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0002431] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Nonablative lasers are used for dermal collagen remodeling. Although clinical improvements have been reported using various laser devices, the mechanism of dermal collagen remodeling remains unknown. Objective To investigate the effects of energy fluences of the long-pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) nonablative laser on dermal collagen remodeling and evaluate the dermal collagen remodeling mechanism. Materials and methods Hairless mice were pretreated with ultraviolet B irradiation to produce photo-damage. The laser treatment used a long-pulse 1,064-nm Nd:YAG laser at energy fluences of 20, 40, and 60 similar to J/cm2. The amount of dermal collagen and expressions of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) of laser treated skin were compared with those of nontreated control skin. Results The long-pulse Nd:YAG laser treatment increased dermal collagen and significantly increased TGF-beta expression. The expression of MMP-1 decreased with low energy fluence. The expression of TIMP-1was not significantly different. Conclusion Long-pulsed 1,064-nm Nd:YAG laser increases the dermal collagen in association with the increased expression of TGF-beta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available