4.6 Article

Intracellular reactive oxygen species in monocytes generated by photosensitive chromophores activated with blue light

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1070-1076

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.12.004

Keywords

ROS; photodynamic therapy; endodontic infection; oxidative stress; cytotoxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Disinfection of the tooth pulp-canal system is imperative to successful endodontic therapy. Yet, studies suggest that 30-50% of current endodontic treatments fail from residual bacterial infection. Photodynamic therapy using red-light chromophores (630 nm) to induce antimicrobial death mediated by generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been reported, but red-light also may thermally damage resident tissues. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that several blue light chromophores (380-500 nm) generate intracellular reactive oxygen species but are not cytotoxic to mammalian cells. Methods. THP1 monocytes were exposed to 10 mu M of four chromophores (chlorin e6, pheophorbide-a, pheophorbide-a-PLL, and riboflavin) for 30 min before activation with blue light (27 J/cm(2), 60 s). After activation, intracellular ROS were measured using a dihydrofluorescein diacetate technique, and cytotoxicity was determined by measuring mitochondrial activity with the MTT method. Results. All photosensitizers produced intracellular ROS levels that were dependent on both the presence of the photosensitizer and blue light exposure. Riboflavin and pheophorbide-a-PLL produced the highest levels of ROS. Photosensitizers except riboflavin exhibited cytotoxicity above 10 mu M, and all except pheophorbide-a-PLL were more cytotoxic after blue light irradiation. Significance. The current study demonstrated the possible utility of blue light chromophores as producers of ROS that would be useful for endodontic disinfection. (c) 2008 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available