4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterisation of zirconium complexes for cell tracking with Zr-89 by positron emission tomography

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 43, Issue 39, Pages 14851-14857

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4dt01928h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering - Wellcome Trust
  2. EPSRC [WT088641/Z/09/Z]
  3. Kings College London
  4. UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre - CRUK
  5. EPSRC in association with the MRC and DoH (England)
  6. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's
  7. St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  8. King's College London
  9. Leukaemia
  10. Lymphoma Research
  11. Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand
  12. Cancer Research UK [16463] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Medical Research Council [MR/J006742/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing availability of the tong half-life positron emitter Zr-89 (half life 78.4 h) suggests that it is a strong candidate for cell labelling and hence cell tracking using positron emission tomography. The aim was to produce a range of neutral ZrL4 lipophilic complexes for cell labelling which could be prepared under radiopharmaceutical conditions. This was achieved when the ligand was oxine, tropolone or ethyl maltol. The complexes can be prepared in high yield from zirconium(IV) precursors in hydrochloric or oxalic acid solution. The oxinate and tropolonate complexes were the most amenable to chromatographic characterisation, and HPLC and ITLC protocols have been established to monitor their radiochemical purity. The radiochemical synthesis and quality control of Zr-89(oxinate)(4) is reported as well as preliminary cell labelling data for the oxinate, tropolonate and ethyl maltolate complexes which indicates that Zr-89(oxinate)(4) is the most promising candidate for further evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available