4.1 Article

Electron microscopic study of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Journal

CYTOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 197-202

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10616-011-9411-4

Keywords

Mouse embryonic stem cell; Cardiomyocyte; Scanning electron microscopy; Ultrastructure

Funding

  1. Jehad Daneshgahi [137-1-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differentiation of embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived embryoid bodies (EBs) is a heterogeneous process. ESCs can differentiate in vitro into different cell types including beating cardiomyocytes. The main aim of the present study was to develop an improved preparation method for scanning electron microscopic study of ESC-derived cardiac bundles and to investigate the fine structural characteristics of mouse ESCs-derived cardiomyocytes using electron microscopy. The mouse ESCs differentiation was induced by EBs' development through hanging drop, suspension and plating stages. Cardiomyocytes appeared in the EBs' outgrowth as beating clusters that grew in size and formed thick branching bundles gradually. Cardiac bundles showed cross striation even when they were observed under an inverted microscope. They showed a positive immunostaining for cardiac troponin I and alpha-actinin. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM & SEM) were used to study the structural characteristics of ESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Three weeks after plating, differentiated EBs showed a superficial layer of compact fibrous ECM that made detailed observation of cardiac bundles impossible. We tried several preparation methods to remove unwanted cells and fibers, and finally we revealed the branching bundles of cardiomyocytes. In TEM study, most cardiomyocytes showed parallel arrays of myofibrils with a mature sarcomeric organization marked by H-bands, M-lines and numerous T-tubules. Cardiomyocytes were connected to each other by intercalated discs composed of numerous gap junctions and fascia adherences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available